Wednesday, March 20, 2013
Xero Blog Goodness
Thursday, February 28, 2013
Xerocon goes off!
The Xero MVP is a new award for most valuable professional. The award this year is for a partners outstanding contribution to the Xero Community in 2012. No photo as Peter wasn’t present.
Judged on the number of organisations added in this financial year-to-date. This is for revenue and customers in the 2012 calendar year.
Judged on the overall look and feel of the design, degree of co-branding partner and Xero representation, content and layout. The tipping point for the winner was the fact that they made the effort to design their site to work well and look good on mobile.
Finman marketing/biz dev manager Josh Ambler pulled together a comprehensive 12-month marketing plan with very clear objectives, which have driven new business leads and taken them to Gold this year.
For Add-on partners less than 18 months old and based on their rate of growth of joint customers.
The Training Partner of the Year Award recognises the quality, popularity and range of Xero training services offered.
This is based on the highest number of Xero organizations the partner is invited into and also highest level of service.
The Add-on Partner of the Year Award is for the top achiever of the year based on volume of joint customers.
This award has been judged on the number of organisations the partner has brought onto Xero.
Monday, February 11, 2013
Boost for your business!
Friday, February 8, 2013
Financial statements: your business story in three parts, love from Xero!
Thursday, January 10, 2013
‘High’ cost employee dismissal
A recent employment case shows the need for perfect process - even if your employee breaks the law. Mr O was employed as a full-time builder by Consortium Construction Ltd for 4 years until he was dismissed without notice for using drugs in the workplace. He denied the accusation and complained that there was no investigation.
What happened: Mr O and his colleagues were working at a demolition site high up on scaffolding when cannabis was smelt and identified as coming from Mr O. He was told to put it out and did so. A manager was later informed of the event, and that Mr O had grinned when confronted, admitting it was something left over from the night before. The manager told Mr O that his employment would immediately end due to his behaviour.
The Employment Relations Authority noted that, as part of the duty of good faith, an employer proposing to end an employee’s employment must give that employee access to relevant information and the opportunity to comment on that information before making the decision. In this case, Mr O had no chance to mitigate his conduct as accidental or make reference to his employment history.
Despite Mr O having smoked marijuana - potentially putting himself and his co-workers at risk - his former employers were ordered to pay compensation for lost income and distress as well as a penalty for an illegal deduction on the final pay - totalling over $12,000.
Moral of the story: seek advice immediately from an employment specialist and make sure proper process is followed and documented. Even when it seems a complete no-brainer.
Tuesday, December 4, 2012
December wind-down checklist
Consider what must be done before you pop the Christmas bubbles - it might save you a hangover and boost New Year celebrations!
Monday, November 19, 2012
Accountants Big Day Out!
We were lucky enough to see presentations by technology companies BankLink, MYOB, Xero and CCH Collaborative Solutions, and service providers Triplejump, Smart Payroll, Get Smart Financial Solutions, Rodgers Reidy, Accountancy Insurance and nsaTax.
We heard from CEO Russell Evans and BankLink's Richard Reese. The first session was Viv Brownrigg talking of Momentum, followed by Nat with a preview of the latest GBU results.
Simon Mundell spoke us about how technology is shaping NZ businesses, then our Product Manager Sara Hansen revealed what's on the schedule for Business Fitness in 2013.
Human Rhythms got everyone drumming after lunch, and then Robyn Pearce gave a few time management tips before Viv Brownrigg invited a panel of guests to talk about growth and service plans.
Last of all came business impresario Bruce Cotterill on profit performance, and MC Dave Steele wrapped up with an unexpected visit from comedian Dave Fane.
A really fun day where we learnt a lot and enjoyed meeting and chatting with all the other accountants. Roll on BDO 2013!
Thursday, March 22, 2012
Remuneration of shareholder employees
The Penny and Hooper decision is a landmark tax avoidance case that has implications for small businesses operating through a company or trust. Essentially, the Supreme Court decided in favour of Inland Revenue, concluding that setting artificially low salaries amounted to tax avoidance.
Penny and Hooper were two orthopaedic surgeons, each earning taxable income of between $600k and $850k a year. They restructured their businesses into companies with a family trust owning most of the shares. They provided their services to the companies in return for salaries of $100k - $120k each year. The balance of the company’s income was declared as dividends to the family trust which the surgeons drew from regularly.
Each year tax of between $20k and $30k was saved by having the profits after salaries taxed at the trustee rate rather than at the surgeons’ individual top personal tax rates. The court found these savings a ‘more than merely incidental’ reason for their low salaries.
The IRD has put businesses on alert and is actively reviewing those operating through a company or trust where the income is generated from services provided by an individual, and the individual’s salary is unreasonably low. Although there may be good reasons for setting the salary low in a particular year, e.g. adverse business conditions, or a planned expansion of the business, in some cases the sole reason for the salary level is to take advantage of the lower tax rate that applies to companies.
The IRD is entitled to go back four years into a business’ records, but have publicly confirmed that where a ‘voluntary disclosure’ is made, only the last two income tax returns will be reassessed. A voluntary disclosure might significantly reduce IRD penalties or avoid them entirely.
Whenever we’re discussing your business we’ll look at this for you. In the meantime, if you are concerned and would like to discuss this with us, please do contact us.